Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 22:04:18 GMT 11
Aparagraph of the Constitution. Regarding the commission of the offense provided for by art. of Law no. in the comissive version the Court found that the legislator by the criticized rule put on the same level activities that constitute a start of execution attempt from the perspective of the crime provided by art. of Law no. with the deed in consummated form from the perspective of the offense of abuse of office in the standard version provided for by art. of the Criminal Code. In other words the offense of abuse of office provided by the provisions of art. of the Criminal Code is identified with the attempted form of the crime provided by art.
Of Law no. . Unlike the other crimes contained in Section of Chapter of Law country email list no. the crime contained in art. of Law no. does not represent a crime qualified by purpose. The text contains a condition the obtaining by the public official for himself or for another of an undue benefit the fulfillment of which if the other constitutive elements are also fulfilled determines the finding of the commission of the offense provided for by him in the consummated form. Thus the offense provided for in art. of Law no. represents a crime of result not being qualified by purpose.
Considering the above the conclusion that is imposed is that although the legislator has regulated the punishment of the attempted form precisely by the way in which it was legislated the possibility of committing for by art. of Law no. . The Court found that this fact determines the impossibility of the person in question to adapt his conduct to the normative prescription which contravenes the constitutional provisions of art. paragraph . The.
Of Law no. . Unlike the other crimes contained in Section of Chapter of Law country email list no. the crime contained in art. of Law no. does not represent a crime qualified by purpose. The text contains a condition the obtaining by the public official for himself or for another of an undue benefit the fulfillment of which if the other constitutive elements are also fulfilled determines the finding of the commission of the offense provided for by him in the consummated form. Thus the offense provided for in art. of Law no. represents a crime of result not being qualified by purpose.
Considering the above the conclusion that is imposed is that although the legislator has regulated the punishment of the attempted form precisely by the way in which it was legislated the possibility of committing for by art. of Law no. . The Court found that this fact determines the impossibility of the person in question to adapt his conduct to the normative prescription which contravenes the constitutional provisions of art. paragraph . The.